We understand the specialized markets in which you operate and provide tailored solutions to meet your unique business needs.
Our comprehensive suite of business services combines industry expertise, market knowledge and professional insights.
MNP is a leading national accounting, tax and business consulting firm in Canada.
Suite 2000, 330 5th Ave. S.W.
MNP careers are Different by Design. As an entrepreneurial firm, we truly believe there are no limits to where your career can go.
The Income Tax Act (Canada) (“ITA”) contains a number of provisions that may apply to a transaction between parties that are not at arm’s length. The purpose of these provisions is to prevent transactions from occurring that may result in one or more parties receiving a tax benefit as a result of their relationship with the other party that may not reflect the ordinary commercial terms of the transaction. In general, where a transaction between two non-arm’s length parties does not occur at fair value, the disposing party to the transaction is deemed to have disposed of the property for its fair value, regardless if the consideration given up by the acquiring party is above or below the actual fair value.
The definition of “arm’s length” is not defined in the ITA although subsection 251(1) of the ITA sets out some general guidelines to consider when determining if two parties are at arm’s length. Understandably, related parties are deemed not be dealing at arm’s length. However, it is a question of fact if unrelated parties may be at arm’s length. The ITA is silent as to the de facto arm’s length relationship. Therefore, we must rely on this determination by the courts. The leading case on de facto arm’s length determination is the Supreme Court decision in the McLarty case where the court confirmed the methodology used by the Federal Court in the Peter Cundill case outlining the following three main criteria to consider when determining if there is a de facto arm’s length relationship:
There are a number of adverse tax consequences that could result if parties enter into a transaction and it is subsequently determined that they are not at arm’s length, such as the conversion of a capital gain to a deemed dividend or the possibility of double tax as a result of one sided adjustments to the deemed acquisition cost to the purchaser.
Following are a few additional considerations that have been utilized by the courts when determining if parties may be at arm’s length:
Therefore, in order to reasonably asses the intended results of various tax motivated transactions, it is important that one looks beyond the blood relationships of the individuals involved in the transactions to assess whether there may in fact be a non-arm’s length transaction that may occur.
Related Topics:Income Tax; Family; Transactions
Find an office near me