We understand the specialized markets in which you operate and provide tailored solutions to meet your unique business needs.
Our comprehensive suite of business services combines industry expertise, market knowledge and professional insights.
MNP is a leading national accounting, tax and business consulting firm in Canada.
Suite 2000, 330 5th Ave. S.W.
Submit an RFP
MNP careers are Different by Design. As an entrepreneurial firm, we truly believe there are no limits to where your career can go.
As a generation of farmers begins to reach the age where they consider scaling down their operations into a semi-retirement mode, many farmers are renting out corporate owned farm land to neighbours or the next generation looking to move back to the farm.
Farmer A, after cash renting out his corporate owned land for the past five years, has decided to sell the shares in his Farm Corp. to his neighbor. Since Farmer A has been cash renting his land for the past five years, he has already disposed of all of the capital equipment in Farm Corp. and land represents 90% of the FMV of the assets in Farm Corp. and has never been less than 50% of the FMV of the total corporate assets over the duration of Farm Corp.
Farmer A is familiar with the concept of the Capital Gains Deduction (CGD) and schedules a meeting with his local tax advisor to go over the potential options to minimize his taxes on a proposed sale. At the meeting Farmer A informs his tax advisor that the land has been held in his corporation for 22 years, 17 of which were actively farmed by Farm Corp. and the last 5 where Farm Corp. cash rented the land.
In order to qualify for the CGD, the shares of Farm Corp. must qualify as “shares of the capital stock of a family farm corporation”. In general terms this means that the shares owned by Farmer A must:
Principally has been administratively defined by the CRA to mean more than 50% in these circumstances. At issue here is whether the land held by Farm Corp. qualifies as a farming asset used principally in the course of carrying on active farming operations? Since Farmer A has indicated that he has actively farmed the land in Farm Corp. for 17 of the 22 total years of Farm Corp., the land generally is considered as having been used principally in the course of carrying on the business of farming so long as the number of years the land was actively farmed by Farm Corp. exceeds the number of years that the land is cash rented, thereby enabling the shares of Farm Corp. to be eligible for the CGD on a sale.
The determination factor is for Farmer A to track the years actively farmed vs. cash rented years to determine the options available. At any time if a farmer determines that they are closing in on the 50% level, it would be prudent to set up a meeting with their local tax specialist to discuss the planning options available before they are lost.
Related Topics:Farmers; Capital Gains; Canada Revenue Agency
Suite 2000, 330 5th Ave. S.W.
Find an office near me