electrical workers looking at power station

Case study: Alberta-based electricity provider – Employee in charge definition

Case study: Alberta-based electricity provider – Employee in charge definition

3 Minute Read

Working with a large Alberta-based electricity transmission and distribution provider, MNP enhanced worksite safety by ensuring role definition and accountability of the employee-in-charge role was clearly understood, from the top down.


The field operations group identified a critical safety risk around definitions of the roles of worksite employee in charge (EIC), qualified utility employee in charge (QUEIC), lead hand / crew EIC, and what constitutes a worksite, as used by its field crews. The roles needed to be refreshed and clearly interpreted by field crew members and leaders. This was a part of a larger program of safety risk improvements the company implemented.


MNP worked with safety leadership, representatives from the field familiar with how the roles are used in practice, and field operations leadership to understand the gaps in the current EIC definitions, as well as how the organization defines a worksite in the field. MNP and field operations leaders developed improved definitions and prepared leaders to deliver the updated information through a series of presentations to managers, their lead hands, and crews performing these roles every day.

Using a rollout approach, team managers were trained on the definitions, then trained their coordinators on the updates. The coordinators then presented the definitions to lead hands and their teams. At each level of rollout, the field operations project manager had discussions with the teams to ensure everyone clearly understood the definitions.

To measure that the message was understood across the organization, MNP developed and delivered a managers’ survey to capture feedback from the field, and developed a workshop with the managers to assess and focus further action based on responses and comments. Client field operations leaders also conducted field visits to audit tailboards and discuss how the field crews were implementing the definitions of worksite, worksite EIC, QUEIC, and crew EIC.


A clear, consistent message was successfully delivered through consultation with field crews and the staged roll-out approach customized with each manager within 90 days. Field visits and documentation reviews by leaders confirmed understanding across crews. Worksites are being defined clearly and the crews understand the responsibilities they have regarding hazard communications. More than simple training, this approach reinforced management communications, feedback to understand impact, and a rapid decrease in potentially high risk safety issues.

Services provided

Energy and Utilities, Training, Change Management, Health and Safety, Construction

Next steps

Learn more about how MNP can help Canadian Energy and Utility organizations rise above challenges and capitalize on opportunities.


  • Progress

    Your farm succession plan isn’t complete until it exists in writing

    The average age of farmers in Canada is increasing. Having a written succession plan becomes more important as you age, to help secure your legacy, protect your farm operation, and reduce conflict.

  • Progress

    How SMARTPro Helps Enhance Practice Value

    Learn how to get your practice into a ready state for a sale with SMARTPro.

  • April 10, 2024

    Unlock board value: key strategies for strong governance

    In the face of ever-present change and rapidly evolving challenges, having a solid board of directors can be a game-changer for your organization.